[env-trinity] Capital Press 09 30 2010

Byron Leydecker bwl3 at comcast.net
Thu Sep 30 14:12:16 PDT 2010

 <http://www.capitalpress.com/> Capital Press agriculture news website




Investors want share of water

Money could boost distribution, but cost farmers 

By  <mailto:wsander at capitalpress.com> WES SANDER 

Capital Press 

A San Joaquin Valley lawyer says hundreds of millions of dollars are waiting
to be invested in California's water infrastructure. 

But there's a tradeoff: The investors putting up the cash want a piece of
agriculture's available supplies, which they could sell to urban users for
high prices. 

Despite the loss of the water, such investment could make supplemental water
more affordable, and therefore accessible to more farmers, said Gary Sawyers
of Sawyers & Holland, a San Joaquin Valley firm that serves mostly
agricultural clients. 

"There are folks who would love to invest in California water infrastructure
if we choose to accept it," Sawyers told the State Board of Food and
Agriculture at a Sept. 22 meeting. 

Sawyers recently spoke with 10-15 fund managers in New York, and is aware of
up to $500 million ready to be invested in a California water project
promising a decent return. 

That means state and federal managers need to smooth out the kinks in their
regulatory processes, including the unpredictable allocations and species
protections of the past few years, Sawyers said. But the biggest question is
whether water interests can learn to live with the concept, he said. 

"Can agriculture tolerate the idea of selling water in the marketplace?"
Sawyers said. It's an idea "that would have gotten me shot in a lot of rooms
just a few years ago." 

Resistance comes from environmentalists who decry the concept of privatizing
water, saying it can only be equitably distributed as a public resource.
Farmers, meanwhile, fear any loss of water allocated to agriculture. 

It's an age-old concern in the state, where fights have brewed for decades
over water rights. A large sale of San Joaquin Valley ag water in 2009, made
by a San Francisco Bay Area-based investment group to a Southern California
urban area, sent shock waves through the farming community. Such sales
happen periodically, causing unrest among ag-water interests. 

Even so, agriculture could benefit from further investigating the pros and
cons of altering the state's water management, said Jill Willis, a water
attorney with Best, Best and Krieger in California. 

"I think the future potential is there," Willis said. 

Private investment could make water more affordable when purchased on a
supplemental basis, Sawyers said. 

A farmer anticipating insufficient deliveries in the coming season can
contract to purchase water transferred from another district. 

Usually transfers take water from north to south, across the Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta and into the drier San Joaquin Valley. Water could also be
transferred east-to-west across the valley to help the parched Westside, but
conveyance capacity is limited. 

Transferred water tends to be expensive, from $300 to nearly $500 per
acre-foot. That puts it out of reach to all but urban districts and larger
growers of high-value crops, mostly nuts and winegrapes. 

Because venture capital would expand infrastructure, it would make transfers
easier and less expensive, Sawyers said. Despite the loss of some water to
investors, what remains could still become more affordable. 

The decision that the farm community must make is whether the trade-off is
worth it, Sawyers said. 

"Is a percentage of something better than 100 percent of nothing?" he said. 

Beyond infrastructure, investors would need the regulatory stability that
valley farmers have said is a top requirement in the wake of drought
conditions and Delta species protections that grew in the past three years. 

That means accomplishing the reform that water interests, water managers and
politicians have been pursuing, through sweeping legislation in 2009 as well
as an ongoing plan by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's administration to rework
Delta conveyance. 

Sawyers said his first-hand knowledge of the investment landscape is likely
the tip of the iceberg. 

There are "tens, if not hundreds, of billions of dollars out there right now
that are hungry for investments in California (water) infrastructure," he



Byron Leydecker, JcT

Chair, Friends of Trinity River

PO Box 2327

Mill Valley, CA 94942-2327

415 383 4810 land/fax

415 519 4810 mobile

bwl3 at comcast.net 

bleydecker at stanfordalumni.org 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20100930/91f828f4/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 73962 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20100930/91f828f4/attachment-0001.jpe

More information about the env-trinity mailing list