[env-trinity] LA Times 3 7 2011

Byron Leydecker bwl3 at comcast.net
Mon Mar 7 13:10:19 PST 2011


House GOP budget bill aims to slash environmental regulation


 


The plan to cut $60 billion from the federal budget targets environmental
programs so widely it appears to be as much an ideological gambit as a
budgetary one. 'The sheer scope of it is overwhelming,' a UCLA environmental
law expert says.


 


Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta

Water birds fly over the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Budget cuts
would kill appropriations for a salmon restoration program on the San
Joaquin River as well as funding for Endangered Species Act fish protections
that have reduced water deliveries from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta.
(Luis Sinco / Los Angeles Times / October 11, 2010)

 

By Bettina Boxall, Los Angeles Times 

March 7, 2011

 

The House spending bill passed last month wouldn't just chop $60 billion
from the federal budget - it seeks to cut a broad swath through
environmental regulation.

>From fish protections in California to water pollution limits in Florida and
regulation of greenhouse gas emissions nationwide, environmental programs
were targets of the Republican budget resolution, which appears to have been
as much about setting a political agenda as about deficit reduction.

Democrats have promised to block the environmental and other cuts in the
Senate, where they hold a slim majority, and President Obama has raised the
threat of a veto, making it unlikely that many of the hits in the proposal
will survive. Lawmakers last week passed a stopgap measure to keep the
government operating while they hash out a compromise.

But few expect the recently elected and highly motivated
<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/parties-movements/republican-party-OR
GOV0000004.topic> GOP majority in the House to give up. "I think they're
going to try and use every tactic in the book," said Nick Loris, a research
associate with the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. "This is
largely what they came into office saying they were going to do."

The continuing resolution adopted by the House two weeks ago swings a much
bigger ax than similar proposals that helped stall a spending measure,
resulting in a government shutdown in 1995. "I've never seen anything
remotely like this. The sheer scope of it is overwhelming," said Sean Hecht,
executive director of the
<http://www.latimes.com/topic/education/colleges-universities/university-of-
california-los-angeles-OREDU0000192268.topic> UCLA Environmental Law Center.

The much-amended proposal, which would fund the federal government for the
fiscal year ending in September, slashes spending on dozens of environmental
initiatives on the state and national level.

In California, the resolution would kill appropriations for a salmon
restoration program on the San Joaquin River as well as funding for
Endangered Species Act fish protections that have reduced water deliveries
from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The measure also withdraws funding
for a study on the removal of hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River and
chops $15 million from the Presidio Trust in San Francisco.

The proposal slices the
<http://www.latimes.com/topic/environmental-issues/environmental-cleanup/u.s
.-environmental-protection-agency-ORGOV000048.topic> Environmental
Protection Agency budget by 30% - the largest cut to any agency. It bars the
EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions and from implementing new water
pollution limits in the
<http://www.latimes.com/topic/us/maryland/chesapeake-bay-PLREC000053.topic>
Chesapeake Bay watershed and in Florida.

The bill stops the agency from enforcing new limits on toxic emissions, such
as mercury, from cement plants and from updating air pollution standards on
dust and other coarse particulate matter that exacerbate
<http://www.latimes.com/topic/health/physical-conditions/asthma-HEPHC000007.
topic> asthma and lung ailments. It withdraws funding for the enforcement of
dredge and fill regulations that the EPA recently used to halt a big
mountaintop-removal coal project in West Virginia.

The legislation blocks a new Bureau of Land Management initiative to
identify and protect
<http://articles.latimes.com/2010/dec/24/nation/la-na-wilderness-20101224>
pristine public lands in the West and withholds funding for a new Forest
Service management plan that would restrict off-road vehicle use in national
forests. It also removes Endangered Species Act protections for wolves in
the northern Rockies and eliminates hundreds of millions of dollars from a
federal land acquisition program.

Sen.
<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/barbara-boxer-PEPLT000628.topic>
Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Environment and Public Works
Committee, called the budget resolution a "slash-and-burn proposal" and "a
backdoor attack on our national landmark environmental laws."

The delta and San Joaquin River sections were written by Rep.
<http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/devin-nunes-PEPLT007910.to
pic> Devin Nunes (R-Tulare), who represents parts of the San Joaquin Valley
and has previously introduced legislation to waive protections for salmon
and the
<http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-delta-smelt-20110202%2C0%2C527655.s
tory> delta smelt and ramp up pumping from the delta, one of California's
major sources of water.

Nunes said his budget language was a "simple attempt to try to get some of
our water back so we can put people back to work." He added that if his
proposal died in the Senate, he would keep pursuing it.

"Every chance that we have to amend a bill or pass a bill, we will be doing
it," said Nunes, who on his House blog last year complained that "
<http://devinnunes.blogspot.com/2010/03/unnatural-greenies-two-faces-of-radi
cal.html,> environmental radicals operating in the name of Gaia, Mother
Earth, the Wiccan religion and a host of other cult-like organizations have
litigated, legislated and extorted away the water needed for San Joaquin
Valley communities."

Terry Anderson, executive director of the Property and Environment Research
Center, which promotes a free-market approach to environmental problems,
said the cuts were driven more by political than budgetary concerns. And he
argued that even if they went into effect, they would have a limited impact.

"The regulations that won't be enforced haven't been the biggest drivers in
improvements in environmental quality in recent years," Anderson said. "We
have a clean environment, and we'll continue to clean it up because of
technology. And that is largely a function of economic growth."

 

 

Byron Leydecker, JcT

Chair, Friends of Trinity River

PO Box 2327

Mill Valley, CA 94942-2327

415 383 4810 land

415 519 4810 mobile

 <mailto:bwl3 at comcast.net> bwl3 at comcast.net

 <mailto:bleydecker at stanfordalumni.org> bleydecker at stanfordalumni.org
(secondary)

 <http://fotr.org/> http://www.fotr.org 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20110307/98af53b7/attachment-0001.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 228349 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20110307/98af53b7/attachment-0001.jpe


More information about the env-trinity mailing list