[env-trinity] SacBee Viewpoint: Northern California river water fetches high profit margins for farmers selling it through transfers
Mark Dowdle - TCRCD
mdowdle at tcrcd.net
Mon Jan 9 11:20:58 PST 2012
This story is taken from Sacbee <http://www.sacbee.com> / Opinion
<http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/index.html> / Viewpoints
Viewpoints: Water barons will corner market in new 'Chinatown'
Special to The Bee
Published Sunday, Jan. 08, 2012
There is more money in selling water in California than there is in
A one-sentence provision inserted in the 2012 budget bill by U.S. Sen.
Dianne Feinstein will allow a handful of powerful San Joaquin Valley
water oligarchs to sell federally subsidized agricultural water in a
private market for as much as 150 times more than what they pay for it.
This relaxation of publicly owned water supplies for private gain strips
out protections approved by Congress in 1992.
They call them "water transfers," and for the last 15 years California
has been quietly edging into a very lucrative privatized water sales
market that seeks to expedite the movement of cheap agricultural water
from Northern California to thirsty Southern California and Bay Area
The cast of characters in this new water wars drama reads like a who's
who of California corporate agriculture:
. Westlands Water District, west of Fresno, which is the largest
irrigation district in the United States and is controlled by a handful
of privately owned agribusiness corporations.
. Beverly Hills billionaire Stewart Resnick, who runs the privately
controlled Kern Water Bank, a 19,900-acre underground reservoir capable
of holding more than a million acre-feet of water. The reservoir was
created by the state before being taken private. Resnick, a longtime
backer of Feinstein, owns Paramount Farms and Roll International, key
players in California's billion-dollar private water market.
Like derivatives, subprime mortgages and deregulated electricity, the
privatization of federally owned water rights is a puzzle palace of
complexity. Here are some of the pieces:
Winter and spring runoff from Northern California rivers, which flow
through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, are crucial to the ecological
health of the Delta, San Francisco Bay and the state's fishing industry.
The Feinstein legislation allows high water flows in the Sacramento and
San Joaquin rivers to be diverted to a private water market rather than
replenishing the Delta and the Bay.
The legislation makes it easier to move federally subsidized
$20-an-acre-foot water from growers with federal project water contracts
to private interests with water rights. Once in the hands of these
buyers, the water can be resold in the open market to the highest bidder.
Westlands Water District and others who will benefit from the
legislation will not be required to fully compensate the U.S. taxpayers
for the public investments in the storage facilities, conveyance
systems, electricity to pump the water or the operation and maintenance
costs that make these private windfall transactions possible.
In short, it socializes the costs and capitalizes the profits, leaving
U.S. taxpayers to foot the bill. Sound familiar?
The Kern Water Bank was originally owned by the state of California and
built to store water in high water years to provide agriculture with
water in drought years and to leave more in the Delta. In 1994, Resnick
persuaded the state to turn over this invaluable public resource to the
Kern County Water Agency. Within a short time the water agency turned
over control of the water bank to a handful of local water districts.
When the dust settled, Resnick's Paramount Farming controlled more than
50 percent. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation recently admitted that
Resnick's Kern Water Bank is on the list of beneficiaries of Feinstein's
In addition, Feinstein's budget rider streamlines environmental review
of these privatized water transfers by disguising the environmental
impacts of individual transfers. One only needs to remember the "rape of
the Owens Valley" and its reincarnation in Roman Polanski's classic
movie "Chinatown" to understand the potential environmental impacts of
moving water and water rights from one geographical area to another.
In anticipation of this Christmas gift to Westlands, the bond-rating
agency FitchRating last year noted the benefit to Westlands from
deregulating the federal water to allow Westlands to engage in more
private water sales:
"The WWD (Westlands Water District) potentially has the ability to sell
and transfer water rights outside the district should agriculture cease
to be economic, as the demand for water in Southern California and the
San Francisco Bay Area by users with connectivity to the CVP (federal
Central Valley Water Project) is very high."
Climate change and global warming studies predict future water shortages
for California. Feinstein's deregulation of vital public water paid for
by taxpayers will enrich a handful of powerful water oligarchs. The
measure will make it possible for a handful of these high rollers to
dominate the California water market and squeeze whatever profits they
can out of thirsty urban water users, leaving the fish and wildlife at
the mercy of so-called free market economics.
The Congress must take a closer look. A privatized water supply paid for
by U.S. taxpayers but controlled by one person or a handful of people is
just plain wrong.
/Patricia Schifferle, a former legislative director and consultant, is
principal/director for Pacific Advocates.
© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 8578 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20120109/a9c02b31/sacramento-bee-logo.png
More information about the env-trinity