[env-trinity] Dan Walters and SacBee Editorial on the story thatjust won't die...
erobinson at kmtg.com
Wed May 1 10:43:31 PDT 2013
The information contained in this E-mail is confidential and may also
contain privileged attorney-client information or work product. The
information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this E-mail in error, please delete this message from your
computer and immediately notify the sender. Thank you.
From: env-trinity-bounces at velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us
[mailto:env-trinity-bounces at velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us] On Behalf Of Tom
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2013 10:34 AM
To: env-trinity at velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us
Subject: [env-trinity] Dan Walters and SacBee Editorial on the story
thatjust won't die...
Editorial: Flimsy justification to call for Jerry Meral's ouster
PUBLISHED WEDNESDAY, MAY. 01, 2013
Congressional representatives from Northern California have reason to
criticize the way Jerry Meral and the Brown administration continue to
push ahead with plans for two gigantic water tunnels in the
Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. We added our voice to those criticisms
But last week's call by five congressional Democrats for the resignation
of Meral, the governor's point man on the Bay Delta Conservation Plan,
was an embarrassment. Did they want him to resign because the tunnel's
ominous potential impact on Delta communities? Because of continued
uncertainties about how much water would be left for the Delta?
No, they demanded the resignation because of something that Meral said -
or purportedly said - within earshot of a pair of activists who are
hardly neutral in their assessment of Meral.
On April 15, Meral reportedly said that the Bay Delta Conservation Plan
"is not about, and has never been about, saving the Delta. The Delta
cannot be saved." These comments were overheard by Barbara
Barrigan-Parrilla, who sent them into the blogosphere.
Meral claims his comments were taken out of context, but even if they
weren't, they don't justify his resignation. More than a century ago,
the Delta was drained, its ecosystem forever changed. "Saving it," at
least restoring it to its pre-1800s state, is impossible, a point Meral
has made in the past.
Sadly, we live in an age when the politics of vilification rages, when a
single comment or image can be blown up beyond proportion. Liberals hate
it when the right engages in these tactics. If so, they shouldn't
practice it when it suits them.
Dan Walters: Maneuvers accelerate on California water plan
Read more here:
Earlier this week, Gov. Jerry Brown's point man on the highly
controversial proposal to bore tunnels beneath the Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta found himself in political hot water.
Gerald Meral, a veteran environmentalist who served in Brown's first
governorship, was quoted as saying during a private meeting that the
project, known formally as the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, "is not
about, and has never been about, saving the Delta. The Delta cannot be
That generated a letter from nine state legislators, all Democrats and
all opponents of the tunnels, demanding that Meral resign and the
project be halted.
Administration officials, apparently eager to avoid further controversy,
said Meral's remarks were "taken out of context" but wouldn't explain
further. They were busy, ironically, making appearances before two
legislative committees that were discussing the tunnels and a bond issue
for Delta improvements and other non-tunnel aspects of the $30-plus
billion overall plan.
However, in the context of how water is now drawn from the Delta,
Meral's remarks are a tempest in a teapot.
"Saving the Delta" is not, and cannot, be a goal because, as virtually
everyone acknowledges, the Delta now is an ecological mess that ill
serves both wildlife, especially salmon, and water users. It is,
moreover, nothing like its seasonally swampy natural state; it is now a
man-made complex of agricultural islands with water flows controlled by
upstream dams and diversions from its southern edge.
As a new and praiseworthy report from the Public Policy Institute of
California points out, the Delta cannot be returned to its natural
state. Its vital roles as coastal estuary and water source can be
improved with rational, science-based management of land and water - but
only if parochial interests cooperate.
That's probably what Meral meant to say, or as Meral's boss, Resources
Secretary John Laird, told a Senate committee Tuesday, quoting a Mick
Jagger song, "You can't always get what you want."
However, the PPIC report, which summarizes exhaustive research about the
Delta and its twin roles as wildlife habitat and water source for about
three-fourths of Californians, also includes new polling data from Delta
stakeholders, indicating that there's little willingness among them to
That political knot was evident both at the Senate hearing and in
another in the Assembly, where lobbyists lined up to protect their
pieces of the proposed $11.1 billion bond issue.
Voters must approve it, but it's already been postponed twice because of
fears of rejection. Efforts are under way to reduce its size - and that
is creating a political frenzy over whose projects will be reduced or
Call The Bee's Dan Walters, (916) 321-1195. Back columns,
www.sacbee.com/walters . Follow him on Twitter @WaltersBee.
Read more here:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 7647 bytes
Url : http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20130501/41d83c32/attachment-0001.gif
More information about the env-trinity