[env-trinity] This just in … Lawsuit Challenges Metropolitan Water District’s Purchase of Delta Islands

Tom Stokely tstokely at att.net
Thu Apr 14 13:51:02 PDT 2016


http://mavensnotebook.com/2016/04/14/this-just-in-lawsuit-challenges-metropolitan-water-authoritys-purchase-of-delta-islands/

This just in … Lawsuit Challenges Metropolitan Water District’s Purchase of Delta Islands
April 14, 2016 Maven  Breaking News
Local governments and consumer and environmental groups charge Met with evading environmental review in attempt to push through Delta tunnels project

Press release from Food and Water Watch, the Planning and Conservation League, San Joaquin County, and Contra Costa County:Today, Food & Water Watch, the Planning and Conservation League, San Joaquin County, Contra Costa County and the Central Delta Water Agency plan to file suit against the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) charging that its claim of complete exemption from environmental review for the proposed purchase of 20,000 acres of Delta islands and farmland is illegal and unjustified. The lawsuit, to be filed in San Joaquin County Superior Court, asks the Court to enjoin MWD from purchasing the property unless and until it completes the environmental review required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).MWD has promoted this land purchase to clear the path for the “California Water Fix” twin tunnels project and remove obstacles to its completion. The purchase would also enable physical changes affecting the properties that may harm the Delta environment and could cost California ratepayers and taxpayers billions of dollars.“It’s not surprising that Metropolitan avoided a proper review as the land purchase is not in the interest of Southern California ratepayers and taxpayers,” said Brenna Norton, Senior Organizer for Food & Water Watch. “This purchase would promote Metropolitan’s effort to build the $67 billion tunnels which will only benefit MWD ‘s bottom line—while costing Southern Californians billions and not providing one drop of new water.”The plaintiffs allege that the land purchase by MWD is part of an attempt take more water from the Delta for MWD use and that the environmental impacts resulting from that activity would be “significant” and outside any exemption from CEQA.“A twin tunnels project has yet to be approved, and Metropolitan Water District has taken brazen steps to bypass CEQA requirements in order to approve the $175 million Delta island purchase and begin a staging zone for twin tunnel construction,” said Mark Myles, Esq., County Counsel for San Joaquin County. “MWD’s actions to sidestep CEQA in its deal to purchase the islands illustrates the lengths that MWD is willing to go to acquire water for its own purposes without any regard for CEQA laws, environmental review and public input. San Joaquin County is not going to stand idly by and allow MWD to circumvent California environmental laws and make up its own rules in order to bulldoze its way through the Delta. MWD should immediately rescind its decision to purchase the islands and perform the environmental review required by CEQA.”MWD falsely asserts it is only interested in Delta habitat restoration and therefore its actions are exempt from any form of environmental review. Yet MWD’s General Manager, and its own promotional materials, admit that the islands could facilitate building the $20-67 billion twin tunnels under the Delta by reducing eminent-domain needs and providing a storage place for construction dirt.Roger Moore, the attorney representing the Planning and Conservation League and Food and Water Watch, noted that “Metropolitan’s outrageous claim that its Delta island purchase is too benign for environmental review can’t be reconciled with its own promotional materials, which portray the island purchase as clearing the path for construction of the Delta tunnels. California’s residents and ratepayers deserve a higher standard of candor and accountability.”The twin tunnel project has no final Environmental Impact Report by the State and no financing plan. Nor have the MWD Board of Directors member agencies approved financing for the project.“Contra Costa County adamantly opposes Metropolitan Water District's attempt to go around CEQA rules,” County Supervisor Karen Mitchoff said. “CEQA protects everyone from blatant attempts to destroy environmental requirements, and MWD's flagrant disregard of CEQA in this instance continues to demonstrate how little it values the Delta and its critical ecosystem. Contra Costa County is a petitioner in this litigation because our citizens understand the importance of everyone having to follow the rules. MWD leadership should be ashamed of this unbelievable tactic, which reflects its ongoing unwillingness to deal with Delta concerns fairly.”“MWD board members need to overturn this illegal decision pressed on them by their general manager,” said Jonas Minton, Water Policy Advisor for the Planning and Conservation League.
For more information …
   
   - Click here for the court filing.
   - Click here for the accompanying letter.
####Food & Water Watch champions healthy food and clean water for all. We stand up to corporations that put profits before people, and advocate for a democracy that improves people’s lives and protects our environment.San Joaquin County has defended the Delta for decades, and will continue to defend the Delta and its 726,106 constituents.Contra Costa County is proud to protect the environmental concerns of the Delta and ensure a safe and reliable water supply for its more than one million residents.Planning and Conservation League (PCL) is a nonprofit lobbying organization, working in the State Legislature to enact and implement policies to protect and restore the California environment.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www2.dcn.org/pipermail/env-trinity/attachments/20160414/5741668a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the env-trinity mailing list