<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1479" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV class=stRep id=stRRFrame>
<DIV class=br2><A
href="http://www.sacbee.com/content/business/story/12367222p-13223441c.html">http://www.sacbee.com/content/business/story/12367222p-13223441c.html</A></DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=br2></DIV><NOSCRIPT><MAP name=stMap><AREA shape=RECT
alt=" E-mail this Page " coords=2,3,107,20
href="/content/business/v-email/story/12367222p-13223441c.html"><AREA
shape=RECT alt=" Print this Page " coords=118,3,220,20
href="/content/business/v-print/story/12367222p-13223441c.html"><AREA
shape=RECT alt=" Sign up for Newsletters" coords=230,3,323,20
href="/static/live/news2go"><AREA shape=RECT alt=" Make Sacbee My Homepage "
coords=334,3,459,20 href="/static/live/sitehelp/mhp.html"></MAP>
<DIV class=br2></DIV></NOSCRIPT>
<DIV class=storyText id=storyBody
style="FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-FAMILY: verdana,geneva,arial,helvetica,sans-serif">
<TABLE class=photoR cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0 hspace="10"
vspace="10">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD class=bgS3 width=1 rowSpan=3><BR><SPACER type="block" width="1"
height="1" /></TD>
<TD class=bgS3 height=1><SPACER type="block" width="1" height="1" /></TD>
<TD class=bgS3 width=1 rowSpan=3><BR><SPACER type="block" width="1"
height="1" /></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD class=bgS2 vAlign=top align=left>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=10 width=246 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=top align=left>
<DIV class=br></DIV><SPAN
class=photoCap><BR></SPAN></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR>
<TR>
<TD class=bgS3 height=1><FONT size=1><SPACER type="block" width="1"
height="1" /><FONT color=#333333></FONT></FONT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<H2>Move to pare ag support opposed</H2>
<H3>Subsidy cuts face hard fight in Congress</H3>
<H4>By Michael Doyle -- Washington Bureau<BR><I>Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday,
February 16, 2005</I></H4>
<TABLE class=bgS2 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD class=f11B vAlign=top align=left>Get weekday updates of Sacramento Bee
headlines and breaking news. <A class=nStoryL
href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/live/newsletters/sacbee_bulletin_signup.html"><FONT
color=#006600>Sign up here.</FONT></A></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR>WASHINGTON -
Legislation planted Tuesday will give the Bush administration a chance to show
it's serious about cutting farm subsidies.
<P>Backed by rural reform and taxpayer advocacy groups, lawmakers introduced
what may be a long-shot bid to limit the subsidies provided cotton, rice, wheat
and corn growers. If successful, the bill could take a bite out of some big
California farms.
<P>"Farm payments that were originally designed to benefit small-and
medium-sized family farmers have contributed to their demise," said Iowa
Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the powerful Senate Finance
Committee. "Unlimited farm payments are driving many family farmers off the
farm."
<P>The so-called Rural Preservation Act would impose a tough new cap of $250,000
on the subsidies that any one farm could receive. The current putative limit is
$360,000. However, farms can obtain more by subdividing into various
partnerships, and some forms of payments are exempt from the limits altogether.
<P>Federal farm payments in California, for instance, include the $1.5 million
paid in 2003 to the Los Banos-based SJR Farming, according to a database
maintained by the Environmental Working Group. Likewise, the compiled
Agriculture Department records show Los Banos-based Wolfsen Land and Cattle Co.
received $1.2 million and the Visalia-based C.J. Ritchie Farms received $1
million in 2003.
<P>Representatives of the three farms could not be reached or declined to
comment Tuesday.
<P>All told, California farms received $672 million in federal commodity
subsidies in 2003. Some 210 California farms received more than $360,000 in
2003, the Environmental Working Group database shows, and 428 received more than
$250,000. Most grew rice in the Sacramento Valley or cotton in the San Joaquin
Valley.
<P>"I think that cutting agricultural subsidies is OK with me, as I prefer a
market-based program," said Fresno County rancher John Harris. "I haven't
analyzed specific ideas, but most of the crops we raise are not involved in the
subsidy crop sector."
<P>But by and large, the subsidy limit proposal draws scorn from politically
influential farm organizations and their Capitol Hill allies.
<P>"It negatively impacts farms in California," said Tulare Republican Rep.
Devin Nunes, a member of the House Agriculture Committee.
<P>"What people don't talk about is that a lot of these are small farmers who
sell their cotton and who make up their losses through the federal payments."
<P>Nunes further dismissed the idea as a "cheap trick" that will almost
certainly die in Congress, given the steadfast opposition of major farm groups.
<P>The new legislation would limit to $100,000 the amount of direct payments and
counter-cyclical payments a single farmer could receive.
<P>These are two forms of subsidies, the latter tied to downturns in market
prices. The bill also would impose a $150,000 cap on loan deficiency payments
and marketing loan gains, which are two other forms of federal support that
critics say are currently provided without effective limits.
<P>The Bush administration last week proposed similar subsidy changes as part of
the fiscal 2006 budget proposal. That subsidy proposal, though, came without any
of the fanfare or political buildup that usually accompanies the White House's
top priorities. It is not yet clear how hard the administration will fight to
overcome farmer resistance.
<P>"The president's budget gives us a lot more impetus," Grassley said, while
adding that he would take whatever level of support Bush might choose to offer.
<P>Bush himself has mentioned the farm subsidy cut once since his budget was
released, in a brief reference as part of a speech to Detroit businesspeople.
<P>In 2002, 66 senators - including California Democrats Dianne Feinstein and
Barbara Boxer - voted in favor of subsidy limits similar to those being
proposed. Feinstein and Boxer later reversed their positions, though, and the
congressional negotiators dropped the proposal.
<P>"I don't think it will go anywhere," Nunes said.
<P><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT></P></DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>