<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=windows-1252">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV class=articleTitle><A
href="http://www.times-standard.com/local/ci_6816037">http://www.times-standard.com/local/ci_6816037</A></DIV>
<DIV class=articleTitle> </DIV>
<DIV class=articleTitle>Hoopa Valley Tribe frets that Trinity River funds will
be drained</DIV><!--subtitle--><!--byline-->
<DIV class=articleByline>John Driscoll/The Times-Standard</DIV><!--date-->
<DIV class=articleDate>Article Launched: 09/06/2007 04:30:20 AM
PDT</DIV><BR>
<DIV class=articlePositionHeader></DIV>
<DIV class=articleBody>
<DIV class=articleViewerGroup id=articleViewerGroup
style="BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-TOP: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px">
<SCRIPT language=JavaScript>
var requestedWidth = 0;
</SCRIPT>
<SPAN class=articleEmbeddedViewerBox></SPAN></DIV>
<SCRIPT language=JavaScript>
if(requestedWidth > 0){
document.getElementById('articleViewerGroup').style.width = requestedWidth + "px";
document.getElementById('articleViewerGroup').style.margin = "0px 0px 10px 10px";
}
</SCRIPT>
<P>
<P>
<P>The Hoopa Valley Tribe is locking horns with some of its allies over
legislation to restore the San Joaquin River, saying it will unfairly affect the
lower-profile rebuilding of the Trinity River, which passes through its
reservation.
<P>The tribe wants provisions put into the San Joaquin bill that would cap the
amount of money that comes from a fund to alleviate the environmental effects of
the huge Central Valley Project, so money can't be stolen away from the already
underfunded Trinity. It's gone so far as to say that the Natural Resources
Defense Council's support of the bill is at odds with its commitment to
environmental justice.
<P>Supporters of the San Joaquin settlement say it won't affect the Trinity, and
so far, lawmakers have stuck to an oath not to allow amendments to the bill.
<P>Hoopa Tribe Chairman Clifford Lyle Marshall said the tribe doesn't oppose
restoring the San Joaquin, but it shouldn't be done at the expense of the
Trinity, which is vital to tribal, commercial and recreational fisheries.
<P>”We're in the uncomfortable position where we have to take a position that a
good piece of legislation is harmful because it didn't take into account other
restoration projects,” Marshall said. </P>
<P>The San Joaquin settlement was born out of a series of talks between
environmentalists, farmers, fishing groups, the state and federal governments
and members of Congress following nearly two decades of legal action. It aims to
give new life to the river -- parts of which have been dry since the early 1950s
when Friant Dam was opened -- by reusing and exchanging water to protect water
supplies for about 15,000 farmers. Restoration efforts aim to revive salmon runs
that are nonexistent above the Merced River.
<P>Some worry that the tribe may end up jeopardizing legislation authorizing
funds for projects to improve the Trinity River as well. A hearing on Rep. Mike
Thompson's Trinity bill is set for Sept. 18. The St. Helena Democrat introduced
the bill in June in light of concerns over the San Joaquin settlement, and would
provide millions a year for five years for Trinity River restoration, then a
lesser amount over the long-term.
<P>Both bills are on somewhat uneasy ground, with current pay-as-you go
provisions leaving legislators struggling to find money to fund legislation.
<P>Another tribe with stakes in the Trinity River, the Yurok, has reserved
judgment on the San Joaquin bill.
<P>”We're not ready to get into any public debate over the bill or the
implementation of that at this time,” said Troy Fletcher with the Yurok Tribe.
<P>Others see the Hoopa Tribe's position as misguided. Byron Leydecker with the
Friends of the Trinity River said the tribe never legally had a place in the San
Joaquin settlement talks. He said the tribe's desired additions to the bill
would be meaningless.
<P>”Many believe that this effort to achieve inclusion of its desired, but
worthless modifications to proposed San Joaquin legislation puts in grave danger
the possibility of passage of both the proposed San Joaquin restoration and
Trinity restoration legislation,” Leydecker wrote in an e-mail.
<P>Zeke Grader of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations -- a
supporter of both efforts -- said his organization feels stuck in the middle. He
said he is not aware of anything in the San Joaquin bill that would compromise
the Trinity effort, and questioned the Hoopa Tribe's tactics to resolve any
differences.
<P>”We're not enemies,” Grader said. “We should be working together on this.”
<P>Hal Candee with the Natural Resources Defense Council reiterated his support
for the Trinity, and said he's trying to work with the tribe. But he disagrees
with the Hoopa Tribe's stance.
<P>”We disagree with the view that using payments by Friant Division contractors
to help fund restoration of the San Joaquin downstream of Friant Dam somehow
limits the U.S. Government's ability to fully fund restoration of the Trinity
River hundreds of miles to the north,” Candee wrote.
<P>But Marshall said the tribe has no choice, and while he agreed it was
unfortunate to be wrangling with its friends, he sees it as vital that the
Central Valley funds not be drained by a huge project like the San Joaquin.
Marshall is scheduled to testify on Thompson's bill on Sept. 18.
<P>
<P>John Driscoll can be reached at 441-0514 or <A
href="mailto:jdriscoll@times-standard.com">jdriscoll@times-standard.com</A>.</P></DIV></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>