<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16544" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV>
<TABLE class=article cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=946 border=0>
<TBODY>
<TR vAlign=top>
<TD id=contentcol><A href="http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/"><IMG
height=21 alt="San Francisco Chronicle" hspace=0
src="http://www.sfgate.com/templates/brands/chronicle/images/chronicle_logo.gif"
width=150 border=0></A><STRONG><FONT face=Arial size=2>
never a dull moment!</FONT></STRONG><BR>
<DIV id=divider><!-- dont write <hr /> here --></DIV>
<DIV class=headlines>
<H1>Senate leader praises farm bill </H1>
<H1>that draws foes of all stripes</H1></DIV>
<P class=byline><A href="mailto:clochhead@sfchronicle.com">Carolyn
Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau</A></P>
<P class=date>Tuesday, November 6, 2007
<SCRIPT language=javascript><!--
OAS_RICH('x90'); //--></SCRIPT>
</P><!--/sharelinks--><!--/sharepop1--><!--/fontpopup--><!--/fontbutton-->
<SCRIPT language=javascript type=text/javascript>
document.getElementById('fontpopup').onmouseout = sfgate_chfont_mo;
</SCRIPT>
<!--/.toolset-->
<DIV class="clear loweredge"></DIV><!--/.articletools-->
<DIV id=articlecontent>
<DIV id=articlebox>
<DIV id=objbox>
<DIV id=contentobjects><A
href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2007/11/06/MN7LT6OAE.DTL&o=0"
target=""><IMG
alt="Sen. Tom Harkin (left), Agriculture Committee chairman, w..."
src="http://www.sfgate.com/c/pictures/2007/11/06_t/mn_farm_bill_t.gif"
vspace=1 border=0></A> </DIV>
<DIV class=clear></DIV></DIV></DIV><SPAN class="georgia md" id=bodytext>
<SCRIPT language=javascript
type=text/javascript>
sfgate_get_fprefs();
</SCRIPT>
<P><STRONG>(11-06) 04:00 PST Washington -</STRONG> -- Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., described the $288 billion, five-year farm bill
that reached the Senate floor on Monday as a historic reform, even as a
broad coalition of critics denounced it as obscene and warned
congressional leaders and presidential candidates that they see changing
70-year old crop subsidies as an election-year test.</P>
<P>The Bush administration issued a blistering veto threat, with acting
Agriculture Secretary Chuck Conner saying the bill makes a mockery of
budget rules, continues subsidies to "Park Avenue millionaires" and
imperils public support for farm programs. He called the bill "just simply
wrong."</P>
<P>Seldom in Washington do such coalitions develop that unite the Bush
White House and the group Environmental Defense on one side, and on the
other, Senate Democrats and Republicans who have set aside their
ideological hostilities to preserve and expand crop subsidies for a
minority of wealthy farmers.</P>
<P>Both parties are scrambling to find billions of dollars to appease
critics coming at them from all sides - from anti-poverty advocates who
look to Democrats to taxpayer groups who find allies among
Republicans.</P>
<P>The bill now before the Senate, written by the Agriculture Committee,
provides $42 billion in subsidies to five crops - corn, cotton, wheat,
rice and soybeans, as well as smaller programs for sugar and dairy. Most
farmers, including the 91 percent of California farmers who grow fresh
fruits, nuts and vegetables, do not get these subsidies.</P>
<P>Payments are based on production, so the most money goes to the biggest
farms. The bill adds a $5.1 billion "permanent disaster" fund that will
mainly reward farmers of the same crops in the Plains states where
marginal land routinely produces crop failures.</P>
<P>Committee Chairman Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, fought unsuccessfully to
reduce the $26 billion in "direct payments" that go to subsidized farmers
regardless of market prices, even as farm incomes increased to an
estimated record $87 billion this year.</P>
<P>"It's very hard to justify direct payments to farmers when we're having
record incomes for farmers and high prices," Harkin said. </P>
<P>Two California farms rank near the top recipients of direct payments
nationwide, according to an analysis by the Environmental Working Group.
Dublin Farms in Corcoran (Kings County) ranks second and would collect
more than $3.2 million over the next five years under the proposed Senate
legislation; Sandridge Partners in Sunnyvale would collect more than $2.2
million.</P>
<P>The bill also includes spending increases for environmental, nutrition
and other programs favored by critics of the subsidy system.</P>
<P>These include $16 million for research in organic agriculture, more
money for conservation, food stamps and other nutrition programs,
including higher purchases of fresh fruits and vegetables. It provides
more money for farmers' markets and other measures aimed at making local
farm produce more accessible.</P>
<P>This has hardly appeased the environmental, religious, public health
and taxpayer groups who say the subsidies damage the environment, hurt
small farmers by speeding farm industrialization, harm impoverished
farmers in the developing world, and boost production of the fats and
starches that feed America's obesity epidemic that now finds 1 in 3
children likely to get diabetes in their lifetime.</P>
<P>"Just because you've rolled horse manure in powdered sugar doesn't mean
you have a doughnut," said Scott Faber, a former Environmental Defense
lobbyist now with the Grocery Manufacturers Association.</P>
<P>"Large-scale corporate farmers are going to continue to win, and here
we are basically begging for peanuts," said John Boyd, president of the
National Black Farmers Association.</P>
<P>Farm aid "should be for all farmers, and not for those who are
politically savvy, and not for those who hire law firms and form
corporations and form partnerships and all of this stuff," Boyd said.
"Everybody knows what's going on, including the leaders of the Senate, but
they refuse to take on those interests and individuals and do the right
thing and put a stop to it."</P>
<P>The bill faces several challenges on the Senate floor, where it is
expected to be debated through next week. One by Sens. Richard Lugar,
R-Ind., and Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., would do away with current crop
subsidies and provide free insurance for all farmers. They would divert
the estimated $16 billion in savings to programs the critics favor. </P>
<P>And Sens. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., and Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, would
keep subsidies intact but limit payments to any individual farmer to
$250,000 each a year. Both farm-state senators fear that millions of
dollars in payments to large farms is undermining public support for farm
programs.</P>
<P>Ken Cook, president of Environmental Working Group, said the farm bill
"will be first and foremost a test of the leadership of the Democratic
Party that now controls the Senate. ... They have to decide if they're the
party of big agriculture or not."</P>
<P>California Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, both Democrats,
have not yet taken positions on the bill. </P>
<P>"I think it's real clear that Boxer and Feinstein are really crucial
swing votes," said Mark Lipson, policy program director for the Organic
Farming Research Foundation in Santa Cruz. "It could really come down to
them making the difference."</P>
<P>Faber said environmental groups were targeting Boxer, a longtime
environmental advocate who chairs the Environment and Public Works
Committee.</P>
<P>"You have a drought in California," Faber said, noting that some of the
state's subsidized cotton acreage also gets federal water subsidies.
"Aren't you guys going to be voting on new infrastructure to increase
access for water?"</P>
<P>Boxer, he said, "ought to be concerned about this. Water is going to be
the next crisis in the West. We all see it. So why should we use water to
produce a commodity that is in surplus and actually works against our
interests? It does not make any sense."</P>
<P></P>
<P><I>E-mail Carolyn Lochhead at <A
href="mailto:clochhead@sfchronicle.com">clochhead@sfchronicle.com</A>.</I>
</SPAN></P></DIV><!--/articlecontent --></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></DIV></BODY></HTML>