<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.headline
{mso-style-name:headline;}
span.articletext
{mso-style-name:article_text;}
span.byline
{mso-style-name:byline;}
span.EmailStyle21
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:#0070C0;
font-weight:bold;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='color:#0070C0'><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='color:#0070C0'><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Richard Kennon
[mailto:tightlines@centurytel.net] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, June 25, 2009 11:16 AM<br>
<b>Subject:</b> New Study: Hatchery fish may hurt efforts to sustain wild
salmon runs<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='color:#0070C0'><o:p> </o:p></span></b></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><img width=517 height=150 id="_x0000_i1025"
src="cid:000400018@25062009-1B2A"><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span class=headline><b><span
style='font-size:24.0pt'>New Study: Hatchery fish may hurt efforts to sustain
wild salmon runs</span></b></span><b><span style='font-size:24.0pt'><br>
</span></b><span class=articletext><i>Posted: Tuesday, Jun 23rd, 2009</i></span><br>
<span class=byline>By David Stauth </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellpadding=0>
<tr>
<td style='padding:0in 0in 0in 0in'>
<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellpadding=0 align=right width=300
style='width:225.0pt'>
<tr style='height:14.25pt'>
<td width=6 rowspan=2 style='width:4.5pt;padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt;
height:14.25pt'></td>
<td style='height:14.25pt;border:none' width=0 height=19></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellpadding=0>
<tr>
<td style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt'>
<table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellspacing=3 cellpadding=0>
<tr>
<td style='padding:2.25pt 2.25pt 2.25pt 2.25pt'>
<p class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><img
width=300 id="_x0000_i1026" src="cid:image001.jpg@01C9F58A.82674DF0"><o:p></o:p></p>
</td>
<td style='border:none;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in' width=28><p class='MsoNormal'> </td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width=0 colspan=2 style='width:.3pt;padding:2.25pt 2.25pt 2.25pt 2.25pt'></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
<td style='border:none' width=0><p class='MsoNormal'> </td>
</tr>
<tr style='height:3.75pt'>
<td colspan=2 style='padding:.75pt .75pt .75pt .75pt;height:3.75pt'></td>
<td style='height:3.75pt;border:none' width=0 height=5></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p class=MsoNormal>Steelhead trout that are originally bred in hatcheries are
so genetically impaired that, even if they survive and reproduce in the wild,
their offspring will also be significantly less successful at reproducing,
according to a new study published today by researchers from Oregon State
University.<br>
<br>
The poor reproductive fitness - the ability to survive and reproduce - of the
wild-born offspring of hatchery fish means that adding hatchery fish to wild
populations may ultimately be hurting efforts to sustain those wild runs,
scientists said.<br>
<br>
The study found that a fish born in the wild as the offspring of two
hatchery-reared steelhead averaged only 37 percent the reproductive fitness of
a fish with two wild parents and 87 percent the fitness if one parent was wild
and one was from a hatchery. Most importantly, these differences were still
detectable after a full generation of natural selection in the wild.<br>
<br>
The effect of hatcheries on reproductive fitness in succeeding generations had
been predicted in theory, experts say, but until now had never been
demonstrated in actual field experiments.<br>
<br>
“If anyone ever had any doubts about the genetic differences between
hatchery and wild fish, the data are now pretty clear,” said Michael
Blouin, an OSU professor of zoology. “The effect is so strong that it
carries over into the first wild-born generation. Even if fish are born in the
wild and survive to reproduce, those adults that had hatchery parents still
produce substantially fewer surviving offspring than those with wild parents.
That’s pretty remarkable.”<br>
<br>
An earlier report, published in 2007 in the journal Science, had already shown
that hatchery fish that migrate to the ocean and return to spawn leave far
fewer offspring than their wild relatives do. The newest findings suggest the
problem does not end there, but carries over into their wild-born descendants.<br>
<br>
The implication, Blouin said, is that hatchery salmonids - many of which do
survive to reproduce in the wild- could be gradually reducing the fitness of
the wild populations with which they interbreed. Those hatchery fish provide
one more hurdle to overcome in the goal of sustaining wild runs, along with
problems caused by dams, loss or degradation of habitat, pollution, over
fishing and other causes.<br>
<br>
Aside from weakening the wild gene pool, the release of captive-bred fish also
raises the risk of introducing diseases and increasing competition for limited
resources, the report noted.<br>
<br>
This research, which was just published in Biology Letters, was supported by
grants from the Bonneville Power Administration and the Oregon Department of
Fish and Wildlife. It was based on years of genetic analysis of thousands of
steelhead trout in Oregon’s Hood River, in fieldwork dating back to 1991.
Scientists have been able to genetically “fingerprint” three
generations of returning fish to determine who their parents were, and whether
or not they were wild or hatchery fish.<br>
<br>
The underlying problem, experts say, is Darwinian natural selection.<br>
<br>
Fish that do well in the safe, quiet world of the hatcheries are selected to be
different than those that do well in a much more hostile and predatory
real-world environment. Using wild fish as brood stock each year should lessen
the problem, but it was just that type of hatchery fish that were used in the
Hood River study. This demonstrates that even a single generation of hatchery
culture can still have strong effects.<br>
<br>
Although this study was done with steelhead trout, it would be reasonable to
extrapolate its results to other salmonids, researchers said. It’s less
clear what the findings mean to the many other species that are now being bred
in captivity in efforts to help wild populations recover, Blouin said, but
it’s possible that similar effects could be found.<br>
<br>
Captive breeding is now a cornerstone of recovery efforts by conservation
programs for many threatened or endangered species, the researchers noted in
their report. Thousands of species may require captive breeding to prevent
their extinction in the next 200 years - which makes it particularly important
to find out if such programs will ultimately work. This study raises doubts.<br>
<br>
“The message should be clear,” the researchers wrote in their
report’s conclusion. “Captive breeding for reintroduction or
supplementation can have a serious, long-term downside in some taxa, and so
should not be considered as a panacea for the recovery of all endangered
populations.”<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal><a
href="http://www.southlincolncountynews.com/V2_news_articles.php?heading=0&page=73&story_id=928">http://www.southlincolncountynews.com/V2_news_articles.php?heading=0&page=73&story_id=928</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Tightlines_____________________________Richard<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>