<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<title>Feinstein's Water Bomb, by Matt Jenkins, High Country News, 2.12.2010</title>
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:#0070C0;
font-weight:bold;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'><a
href="http://www.hcn.org/articles/feinsteins-water-bomb">http://www.hcn.org/articles/feinsteins-water-bomb</a><br>
<br>
</span><b><span style='font-size:18.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>Feinstein's
Water Bomb<br>
</span></b><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>California
senator takes aim at Delta fish protections</span></b><span style='font-size:
11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> <br>
<span style='color:#0070C0'><o:p></o:p></span></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>News
- February 12, 2010 by Matt Jenkins <br>
</span><b><span style='font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'> <br>
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., is preparing to introduce a legislative rider
that would dramatically reduce Endangered Species Act protection for salmon and
other fish in California. The amendment would lift restrictions on the amount
of water that farmers can pump from the Sacramento-San Joaquin river delta for
the next two years. But it could also scuttle a delicately negotiated effort to
balance protections for endangered fish with the water needs of farms and
residents of Southern California.<br>
<br>
Feinstein’s effort comes as the state seems bound for the third year of
an emergency fishing ban to protect dwindling salmon runs, and as populations
of the Delta smelt and other fish continue to crash. And the move is a
remarkable turnaround: Just four months ago, Feinstein denounced Sen. Jim
DeMint, R-South Carolina, for trying to introduce a similar amendment at the
behest of California water districts.<br>
<br>
Feinstein's office declined repeated requests for details and comment
yesterday, but insiders familiar with the matter say that the Senator’s
reversal is largely due to lobbying by the Westlands Water District. Last year,
after three years of drought, the federal government cut water deliveries to
many irrigation districts in the San Joaquin Valley. Westlands, which is the
largest district of its kind in the nation, was hit the hardest, and saw its
supply of water from the Delta dwindle to just 10 percent of the amount it
holds contracts for. <br>
<br>
Westlands is "a coyote with its leg in a steel-jawed trap," says
Jason Peltier, the district’s chief deputy manager. “Short-term,
we’re going to pursue every right and legal avenue we have to protect
ourselves.” <br>
<br>
But pushing aside the federal pumping restrictions intended to protect
threatened smelt and endangered salmon would solve only part of the
district’s problem. Fish-related restrictions account for just 15 to 20
percent of the cutbacks, according to an independent analysis by the Public
Policy Institute of California. The vast majority of the water shortage is due
to the drought. (For an in-depth exploration, see Breakdown <<a
href="http://www.hcn.org/issues/42.1/breakdown">http://www.hcn.org/issues/42.1/breakdown</a>>
).<br>
<br>
Westlands' battle against the pumping restrictions has nonetheless reached a
heart attack-inducing pace. Last week, the district led a confederation of
farm-water agencies in asking federal district judge Oliver Wanger to order the
federal government to run its Delta pumps at maximum capacity. That helped
capture the surge of water delivered by a massive winter storm, but the
reprieve lasted just six days before the government had to throttle down its
pumps. On Wednesday, Westlands and other water users asked Wanger to order that
those pumps be started up again, but the judge denied that motion. <br>
<br>
Then, on Thursday, Sen. Feinstein announced that she is considering an
amendment that will essentially do what Judge Wanger would not.
Feinstein’s office has not released a final draft of the rider, which the
Senator intends to attach to the jobs bill now before Congress. Sources who
helped craft the amendment say that it won’t be a flat-out waiver of
Endangered Species Act protections — but, for fish, the rider may be even
worse than an outright waiver. <br>
<br>
Under the current endangered-fish restrictions, the federal government
can dial its pumps up or down within a specified range to respond to changing
conditions. Yet the government, Peltier says, has tended to be overly
conservative. "We have been hoping for the regulators to exercise some
discretion," he says. "But they just default to the most restrictive
levels possible."<br>
<br>
Feinstein's rider would force federal officials to keep the pumps floored at
the highest levels currently permitted. Westlands spokeswoman Sarah Woolf says
that would allow water agencies to pump an extra million acre-feet of water out
of the Delta during the winter and spring. If that's true, it would mean that,
based on the Public Policy Institute of California’s analysis,
Feinstein's rider would allow irrigation districts to pump twice as much water
from the Delta as they could were the current fish protections totally
eliminated.<br>
<br>
As a sop to fishermen put out of work by the salmon-fishing ban, the rider
contains a provision for disaster assistance funds for fishing communities. But
Feinstein’s announcement is threatening a much quieter, and potentially
more far-sighted, round of deal making that has been underway in Sacramento. In
that negotiation, which started three and a half years ago, water agencies like
Westlands and the Metropolitan Water District, which supplies 19 million people
in Los Angeles and San Diego, invited state and federal agencies and
environmental groups to meet. The goal of that effort is an agreement on the
Bay Delta Conservation Plan, a long-term strategy that would allow water
pumping to continue for the next half-century in a way that complies with the
state and federal Endangered Species Acts. That effort is now intended to
create the operational blueprint for the sweeping water package passed by the
state legislature last fall. <br>
<br>
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's administration has been firm in its support of the
Bay Delta Conservation Plan and its commitment to seek solutions that
don’t require suspending endangered species protections. Last September,
after Sen. DeMint introduced his amendment, Lester Snow — who was then
director of the California Department of Water Resources and is now
Schwarzenegger’s resources secretary — wrote to Feinstein to "express
our strong opposition to any effort to set aside, suspend, or otherwise weaken
the Endangered Species Act." <br>
<br>
"The state is committed to working with stakeholders and our federal
partners in the Bay Delta Conservation Plan process to achieve the co-equal
goals of a healthy ecosystem and a reliable water supply," Snow wrote.
"Weakening or suspending (the Endangered Species Act) does not contribute
to this effort."<br>
<br>
Now, however, faced with the specter of Feinstein introducing an amendment that
could weaken protections for fish, most of the environmental groups that are
participating in the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan — including the
Environmental Defense Fund, Defenders of Wildlife and the Bay Institute —
are contemplating a walkout. <br>
<br>
"The rider would effectively pull the rug out from under the Bay Delta
Conservation Plan," says Ann Hayden, a senior water resources analyst with
the Environmental Defense Fund. Ramped-up pumping would, she says, worsen
already bad conditions for salmon and smelt. "It would create an even
bigger hole that we have to dig our way out of."<br>
<br>
If the environmental groups pull out of the Bay Delta Conservation Plan, that
could increase the water agencies' exposure to legal challenges later this
year, when they seek approval for the final plan from state and federal
regulators. "To the extent that fewer and fewer environmental interests
are involved in the process, it becomes more and more like a water-user wish
list," says Gary Bobker, the program director for the Bay Institute.
"You’re inviting failure."<br>
<br>
Last fall, in response to a request from a large farming corporation called
Paramount Farms, Sen. Feinstein asked the National Academy of Sciences to carry
out a pair of reviews of the science behind the current pumping restrictions.
The environmental groups participating in the Bay Delta negotiations have stood
behind the National Academy, which is scheduled to release its first report in
March. <br>
<br>
Now, however, with Sen. Feinstein introducing legislation that will revamp pumping
requirements before the first National Academies report is even completed, and
with water agencies inside the Bay Delta Conservation Plan mounting numerous
challenges to the Endangered Species Act on the outside, the environmental
groups that gambled on the plan are beginning to smell a set-up.<br>
<br>
"We’re being pushed into a corner," says Hayden. "We are
losing this. We're getting played."</span></b><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>