<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I've seen this graphic before, but have never seen a good description of how the numbers are determined.  Does anyone know the math behind the figures in this graph?  Since it's credited to DWR, I know there's a formula somewhere.  Does this presume to account for all of the water that falls from the sky in any form, lands in California, and then goes somewhere? Does it account for evaporation, for water that stays in the mountain lakes of the Sierras and elsewhere, becomes groundwater, or is taken up and transpired by the douglas fir and ponderosa pine forests in the state? </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">If the argument is made that most comparisons are just for "developed" water, and that the comparison needs to be expanded, then the next question might be, where do you stop?  If "the gross domestic joy generated by rivers" is considered a use of water, why not count the water that goes toward the bright green buds of new growth on a pine tree in the spring?  Maybe the math gets too complex at that point, but surely someone has calculated how much water a pine tree can transpire into the atmosphere in a season of growth.  </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Hey, I just thought of something, is all the water that grows all the trees that are harvested in California part of the agricultural water? </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Time for some more math?!</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Cheers,<br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">jay</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Sari Sommarstrom <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sari@sisqtel.net" target="_blank">sari@sisqtel.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626"><a href="http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-johnson-big-picture-california-water-20150517-story.html" target="_blank">http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-johnson-big-picture-california-water-20150517-story.html</a></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif""><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:25.5pt;background:white"><b><span style="font-size:25.5pt;font-family:Belizio;color:#cccccc">Op-Ed</span></b><span style="font-size:25.5pt;font-family:LAHeadline">: In the water crisis, it's time to move beyond the farms vs. cities mindset<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height:15.0pt;background:white"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#666666">By </span></b><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#ff5443;text-transform:uppercase">Nathanael Johnson</span></b><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";text-transform:uppercase"> <u></u><u></u></span></b></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">At this point, just about every Californian with a pulse knows that agriculture uses 80% of the state's water, and cities 20%. This talking point is true as far as it goes, but that's not very far. You have to limit your vision to the water consumed by humans, “developed” water. This perspective blinds us to the big water picture, and it sets up an unnecessary opposition between farms and cities.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626"><img border="0" width="253" height="450" src="cid:image001.jpg@01D09157.80574690" alt="How water is used in California"></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626"><u></u> <u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">The 80/20 view of California water leaves out the water<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">required to keep riverine fish and riparian habitat alive. It<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">leaves out the freshwater flows needed to keep saltwater<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">from surging into the Sacramento-San Joaquin River<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">Delta. And it leaves out beauty and the gross domestic joy<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">generated by rivers.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">Here's the complete picture: About 50% of California<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">water goes toward maintaining environmental quality,<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">40% goes to agriculture, and 10% goes to cities (including<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">business uses such as manufacturing). It can be<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">counterintuitive to think of the environment as a water<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">user — after all, that water is “used” only insofar as we<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">leave it in the rivers. But allowing water to flow down<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">rivers to the sea really is an active use with measurable<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">benefits. We devalue the environment if we leave it out of<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">the equation. And we can't judge the arguments for and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">against such uses if we don't acknowledge that they exist.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">Still, it's the ag/urban split that sticks in our minds.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">Whether the figure is 80% or 40%, the fact that farms use<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">so much more water than cities evokes fury from those<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">who see farmers as robber barons, converting a natural<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">resource into private fortunes. There's a growing populist<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">sentiment that irrigation water is simply making rich<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">farmers richer.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">This is by no means self-evident. It's worth noting that<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">public sentiment was once precisely reversed and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">irrigation was seen as a democratizing force.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">In 1870, giant dry-farmed wheat estates and cattle ranches<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">dominated the Central Valley. But with irrigation, a family<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">farmer could make a living on as little as 10 acres selling<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">vegetables, fruit and nuts. At that time, Californians saw<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">irrigation as a way to break up the land monopolies and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">foster Jeffersonian farmers.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">The reality, of course, is complex. In the beginning,<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">irrigation enriched the monopolists even more than small<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">farmers, but as Norris Hundley Jr. shows in his history of<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">the state's water, “The Great Thirst,” it also built up an<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">agricultural middle class in places such as Fresno, Merced<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">and Stockton. Irrigated agriculture provided for the<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">egalitarian beginnings of Anaheim, Riverside and Ontario.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">It has been the means by which many immigrants —<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">German, Swiss, Armenian, Hmong and Mexican — have<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">made their stake in California.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">And the situation remains complex today: Irrigation water<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">supports millionaires with giant tracts of land and middleclass<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">family farmers alike.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">Another reason the 80% figure has gone viral is that it<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">contains an uncomfortable truth: It takes a lot of water to<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">grow food. Contrary to conventional wisdom, drip irrigation<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">systems and micro sprinklers do very little to<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">change a crop's consumption of water. It's true that less efficient<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">techniques like flood irrigation use more water,<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">but what isn't required by the plants isn't lost, it goes down<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">into the aquifer or back into the river. Increasing the<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">organic matter in soil — with techniques such as<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">composting, mulching and reduced plowing — can<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">improve water retention and lessen water use. But the<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">lion's share of irrigation water goes into the plants, and<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">that's hard to change. In the end, any cuts to irrigation<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">mean less food production.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">Less food production means less economic activity. That's<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">not cause for panic: Agriculture accounts for just 2% of<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">California's massive economy. Nonetheless, California has<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">the highest agriculture sales of any state, and those sales<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">are the bulwark of many poorer counties. There are really<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">two Californias: a wealthy coast and a poor inland that<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">relies heavily on farmers.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">Whenever there is a drought, farmers suffer first — they<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">idle land, pump groundwater. Each year, farmers have<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">been pumping up more water than seeps down, but a law<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">passed last year will change that. There will be even less<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">water for farmers as the new regulations put an end to<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">groundwater mining and the climate warms. There's no<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">getting around it: Those cutbacks will hurt.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">In cities, by contrast, residents can cut water consumption<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">with much less pain. Los Angeles has kept its water<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">consumption flat since the 1980s while adding a million<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">residents, thanks to improved technology (low-flow<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">toilets!) and improved landscaping (these dry gardens are<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">far more beautiful than turf, in my humble opinion).<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">In a moment of crisis, it's human nature to look for<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">villains: Liberals against conservatives, north against<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">south, farms against cities. The 80/20 statistic neatly — far<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">too neatly — defines the conflict. But is the objective to<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">define our enemies and triumph over them, or do we want<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">to find solutions for the greater commonwealth?<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent:.5in;text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">If it's the latter, we should watch to ensure that our new<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">groundwater law results in rules for real sustainability,<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">move swiftly to restore water to residents whose wells have<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">gone dry, step up our water conservation efforts and stop<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">thinking in terms of them versus us. Most important, we<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">must continue California's leadership in fighting climate<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">change. It's misleading to zero in on part of the picture: If<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">we want holistic solutions, we have to take the holistic<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">view.<u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">Nathanael Johnson, a Bay Area journalist, writes the<u></u><u></u></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">"Thought for Food" column at Grist.org. He is the author<u></u><u></u></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">of "All Natural" and a contributor to Harper's Magazine,<u></u><u></u></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">New York and "This American Life." Twitter:<u></u><u></u></span></i></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626">@SavorTooth.</span></i><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626"><u></u><u></u></span></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-autospace:none"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Georgia","serif";color:#262626"><u></u> <u></u></span></p></div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
env-trinity mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:env-trinity@velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us">env-trinity@velocipede.dcn.davis.ca.us</a><br>
<a href="http://www2.dcn.org/mailman/listinfo/env-trinity" target="_blank">http://www2.dcn.org/mailman/listinfo/env-trinity</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>